Much has been written about the value of “Integrated Communications” both here and elsewhere. Public relations agencies are building capabilities to offer integrated communications services to clients, and more and more organizations are trying to implement best practices, with varying levels of success. In the life sciences and medical tech sectors in particular, integrated communications is an effective way to reach key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, key influencers, patients and advocacy groups, and the investment community.
But the term “Integrated Communications” means different things to different people. Some would define it as leveraging multiple communications channels (e.g., email, blogs, print, broadcast, social media) in a campaign. That’s sometimes referred to as “integrated marketing communications,” a practice that can help an organization increase the visibility of its brand and the reach of its message.
However, in a larger sense, integrated communications can be described as a communications management process that focuses on conveying messages in a clear and consistent manner that reaches and resonates with a variety of audiences. This means “integrating” the perspectives of all stakeholders and disciplines into a core set of messages that are faithfully delivered through all campaigns and communications channels.
Life sciences and medical technology companies in particular should recognize and take advantage of the fact that, due to the proliferation of digital communications channels, their messages about innovation and value are being delivered to, and digested by, more than one set of stakeholders. Still, many healthcare companies are only thinking about one target audience at a time (e.g., investors or prescribers) or have different parts of their organization speaking disparate, incongruent messages to the same audiences.
For example, a public company may want to communicate the results of a clinical trial to meet SEC disclosure requirements and attract more investors. However, scientific thought leaders and patient advocacy groups who have a stake in the eventual introduction of the investigational therapy may also find value in the information. If the company hosts an analyst conference call to talk about the new data, it’s important that the message is comprehensible to and resonates with multiple stakeholders, engenders understanding and support, mitigates the potential for misunderstanding and opposition, and stays within the boundaries of regulatory guidelines.
If a reporter for a widely-read publication listens in on the call and reports about the study, for instance, it can help healthcare professionals and patients understand the company’s R&D progress. But if the story quotes a company executive telling call participants that the results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the therapy, it may be viewed by the FDA as an unsubstantiated claim for an unapproved therapy. There is a fine line between objectively reporting data and making promotional claims that are not sanctioned by the FDA, particularly when anyone may be reading or listening to your communications.
One of the biggest challenges to achieving communications integration in the agency and corporate setting is culture. The larger and more established your organization, the more critical integration becomes and the more difficult it can be to achieve. A marketing manager who’s focused solely on communicating about a product or a functional head who can’t be bothered to try something new can both be impediments to your efforts. Of course, the world won’t come to an end if a marketing campaign doesn’t include corporate branding messages or doesn’t speak to all potential audiences, but a series of missed opportunities can ultimately impact the organization’s ability to effectively communicate its overall value.
Even though this all makes sense and indeed may seem obvious, in my experience, integrated communications does not happen more often than it does. So what do you do when an organization resists integrating the communications process?
In summary, integrated communications can help your organization reach target audiences more effectively than traditional news channels like press releases and media alone. But it’s more than just using multiple channels. It is a communications management process whereby different functions within an organization work collaboratively to communicate clear, coherent, consistent and complimentary messages that maintain and enhance the overall value and visibility of an organization among an array of stakeholders. When it happens, it’s beautiful to behold.
Jim Heins is Senior Vice President at ICR Healthcare and has more than 25 years of experience providing strategic communications counsel and support to emerging and multinational biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device companies. He specializes in corporate reputation, scientific and marketing communications, stakeholder engagement, crisis management, and patient advocacy and education.
by Jim Heins